Matt 7:12 |
Luke 6:31 |
Didache 1 |
Thom 6 |
|
|
2 The Way of Life |
|
|
|
is this: first |
|
|
|
you shall love |
|
|
|
the God |
|
|
|
who made you; |
|
|
|
second, |
|
|
|
your neighbor |
2 Jesus said: |
|
|
as yourself. |
"Don't lie |
12 "Always |
|
And |
and |
treat people |
27 "Treat people |
don't treat people |
3 don't do |
the way |
the same way |
the way |
what |
you want |
you want |
you don't want |
you hate." |
them |
them |
them |
|
to treat you. |
to treat you." |
to treat you. |
|
This sums up |
|
|
|
the Law |
|
|
|
and the Prophets." |
|
|
|
Conventional maxim
Since the eighteenth century this principle of
human relations has usually been called "the golden rule." It has
understandably become the most widely known saying ascribed to Jesus.
Yet, it cannot easily be traced to him. For unlike the paradoxes
earlier in Q's sermon, it is a practical maxim with parallels in the
conventional wisdom of many ancient cultures.
Q phrased the golden rule as a positive precept for social behavior. A
negative version, however, had long been familiar to Judean sages. Tobit,
a popular tale about Israelites taken to northern Iraq more than
seven hundred years before Jesus, presented it as parental advice about
self-control:
Guard yourself in all you do, my son,
and discipline yourself in all your behavior.
What you hate, don't do to someone else.
-- Tobit 4:15
According to a later anecdote, Hillel, a prominent rabbi from Jesus'
time, identified this maxim as the basic rule in Judaic ethics:
What you hate, don't do to another.
That's the whole Law, everything else is commentary.
-- Babylonian Talmud, tractate Shabbath 31a
So, the sentiment ascribed to Jesus in Matt 7:12b was not novel. Even
early Christian texts usually echoed the traditional negative
formulation of the golden rule. Thomas 6:3 credits that version to Jesus. Yet, the Didache 1:2 introduced it for what it really was: a common precept of
"the way of life" rather than the insight of any particular teacher.
Attribution
Since Jesus obviously did not invent the golden rule,
the Jesus Seminar had to decide whether he explicitly endorsed it in one
form or another. Did he echo the traditional formula, as Thom 6:3
reports? Or did he create a positive paraphrase, as Q suggests? A
person who told others to love their enemies would certainly not object
to either the negative or the positive form of this maxim. But tacit
agreement in principle does not show that a sentence was uttered by
Jesus' own lips.
Golden Rule |
% |
Red |
Pink |
Grey |
Black |
WA |
Print |
Luke 6:31 Matt 7:12a Matt 7:12b Thom 6:3 Did 1:3 |
|
12 12 3 0 0 |
9 9 3 4 10 |
50 52 22 4 33 |
29 27 69 92 57 |
34 35 14 4 18 |
grey grey black black black |
The hard evidence surprisingly does not prove that Jesus actually taught the
golden rule. Q and Thomas, the two sources, that credit this maxim to
Jesus, could not agree on exactly what he said. Only scribes who knew Q
(Matthew and Luke) cited the positive formula: "Treat people the way you
want them to treat you.” Some Fellows thought that this wording was
original enough to accept as a genuine Jesus saying. But its
originality was not obvious enough to prevent Thomas and the Didache
from preferring the traditional negative version.
Unfortunately, the positive paraphrase of the golden rule does not step
enough out of the ordinary to mark it as a genuine Jesus saying. The
number of red aphorisms already found in Q's sermon reveal Jesus as an
unusual sage who was prone to making dramatic inversions of common
opinions. He inherited many traditional principles, of course. For no
one can be totally unconventional. But Jesus' original sayings
challenge people to revise their view of themselves and to abandon
normal views of self-preservation. "Congratulations, you poor!," "Love
your enemies!," and "Turn the other cheek!" are sayings that strike with
a sharp edge. The common sense of the golden rule is more comfortable.
It uses the fact that people have a self-centered concern with their own
well-being to persuade them to treat others better. One Fellow quipped:
"If Jesus did not teach the golden rule, he would have been about the
only sage who didn't." Yet, if he endorsed it, he failed to give it his
characteristic stamp.
Nevertheless, the golden rule was used early and widely to interpret the
gist of Jesus' genuine teaching. It bridged the gap between his
distinct viewpoint and common sense. Hence, the majority of the Jesus
Seminar colored Q's positive variant (Luke 6:31//Matt 7:12a) gray.
The added comment in Matt 7:12b that the golden rule is the core of biblical
teaching was not in Q. It sounds like something Matthew learned from
Hillel rather than from Jesus.